Bedside teaching: specialists versus non‐specialists

Bedside Teaching: Specialists vs. Non- specialists

Word Count: 249 (including titles) Main Text Word count: 1422 (including titles) Number of tables: 2 Deemed exempt from full review by University Research Ethics Committee (UREC) (University of Dundee, UREC Reference number: 11077) This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: ‘Bedside Teaching: Specialists versus Non-specialists’, Clinical Teacher 13:2 (2016), which has been publ...

Patient 's Bedside Teaching: Advantages and Disadvantages

Introduction:Nursing education includes both theoretical and clinical areas, therefore it has special features and problems of its own. One is establishing integration between theoretical and clinical training . Patient's bedside teaching is considered to be an important component of clinical education. Time spent with the patient is full of visual, auditory and tactile experiences and there...

On bedside teaching.

Actual teaching at the bedside during attending rounds, with emphasis on history taking and physical diagnosis, has declined from an incidence of 75% in the 1960s to an incidence of less than 16% today. Profound advances in technology, in imaging, and in laboratory testing and our fascination for these aspects of patient care, account for part of this decline, but faculty must also assume respo...

Teaching at the bedside.

Teaching at the bedside: a new model.

The patient is at the center of clinical medicine. In order to effectively teach clinical skills a teacher must learn to involve patients in the educational process. It is through this process that learners acquire the skills of observation, communication, examination and professionalism. Despite the importance of teaching with the patient present, many clinical teachers are hesitant to teach a...